Yes. FEDS now models and evaluates lighting controls, including occupancy sensors. To model existing lighting controls, the user must select the appropriate "yes" response to the "Existing lighting controls?" input and review the existing utilization factors. To infer reasonable utilization factors for the controlled lighting, specify the appropriate space type for the space where the lights exist.
FEDS will also automatically evaluate the savings potential and cost-effectiveness of lighting controls where they do not currently exist. In this scenario, select "no–evaluate occupancy sensor" and identify the most applicable space type. In this case, the "existing" utilization factors identify the portion of time that the lights are currently on, while the "with controls" utilization factors will be used by FEDS to model the impact of the occupancy sensor controls. The "number of sensors required" is used by the cost model to identify how many sensors need to be installed to control the current lighting.
No. FEDS infers parameters based on the most likely current condition of a building and its equipment. Inferences for an 1820 vintage building will reflect the typical improvements and upgrades that have occurred over time.
Each lamp and ballast modeled within FEDS has a rated life (specified in hours) associated with it. Actual replacement intervals are calculated within the model based on the light's modeled operating hours (based on utilization factors and occupancy schedules) and rated life of each component. When a lamp or ballast fails, FEDS accounts for the cost to replace the component by figuring both materials and labor requirements. These costs are tallied over the economic study period and reported as the non-annual maintenance cost. FEDS uses the non-annual maintenance cost along with energy and capital costs in determining which fixture can best provide the required level of service at the lowest life-cycle cost.
Exterior lighting, such as security or parking lot lights can be included in FEDS by selecting the exterior fixture location. This will set the heat to space to 0 and alter the calculation of utilization factors appropriate for typical nighttime operation.
Refer to Appendix G of the FEDS User's Guide. Ex: FL 2x4 4F40T12 STD2 = a 2-foot by 4-foot fluorescent fixture, with four 40 watt T12 (1.5 inch diameter) lamps, operated by two standard magnetic ballasts (designed to operate two lamps each).
If the building is newer than the rated life of the equipment in question, then the remaining life is equal to the difference of rated life and building age. If the building is older than the equipment's rated life, FEDS assumes that on average, equipment will be halfway through their life (but users can override this assumption and specify actual equipment vintage). Rated lives vary by equipment technology. Some examples of rated lives used in FEDS are:
envelope components (windows, insulation, etc.) – 40 years
lights – typically 25 years (Although the cost of replacing lamps and ballasts is figured into the analysis based on specific replacement intervals and hours of operation)
boilers – 40 years
furnaces – 20 years
chillers – 20 years
package AC units – 15 years
heat pumps – Air Source/15 years, Ground-Coupled/20 years
motors – 15 years
hot water heaters – electric, 12 years; gas, 10 years; distributed heat pump, 12 years; central heat pump, 15 years
FEDS contains a built-in database of building survey data and is able to infer a number of building parameters based on the small set of required inputs provided by the user. For example, FEDS uses information such as building type, location, floor area, and vintage to determine the most likely construction type and geometry. It uses similar information along with heating fuel type and cooling equipment, to determine the most likely heating technology and ventilation system parameters for a building. All inferences enable a user to model buildings without having intimate knowledge of the detailed engineering parameters. The resulting building prototype parameter values are statistically the most likely values based on the limited set of information provided. Of course, all inferred data may be easily overwritten by simply entering (locking) a value in the user interface screens.
FEDS draws upon a number of sources to determine inferable parameter values. Major sources include national building energy consumption surveys such as the Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption, Residential Energy Consumption Survey, large end-use studies such as the End-Use Load and Consumer Assessment Program, ASHRAE handbooks, building and equipment codes and standards, and manufacturers' data and extensive building audit and evaluation experience.
The utilization factors for lighting represent the portion of time particular lights are on, on average, over the building set. They are expressed as a fraction of the maximum possible load (i.e., 100% of the lights are on 100% of the time) for a given time period. FEDS infers the occupied and unoccupied period utilization factors based on what is typical on average for the lighting technology and use-area type. FEDS typically assumes that some lights are on even during unoccupied times for security, safety, or cleaning staff, or simply because lights were left on. During seasonally unoccupied months and other periods defined as non-operating, utilization factors are set to 0 for all lighting records except for exit lights, which are assumed to operate constantly.
A locked value, in terms of FEDS inputs, is one that the user has entered for an inferable parameter. This indicates to the model that this is a user-entered value and should not be updated (inferred). Clicking on the lock symbol can also lock a currently inferred value. When a value is locked, the lock icon will appear as a latched or closed lock. To unlock a value, simply click the icon again, changing it to an open or unlatched lock. This value will now be inferred the next time inferences are run.
FEDS project costing algorithms account for any materials, taxes, and labor costs applicable to a given retrofit measure. Additionally, 15% contractor overhead, 10% design cost, and 6% site level supervisory, inspection and overhead factors are applied, along with any multipliers specified on the regional costs screen under the financial options. Note that many of the cost factors reflect real regional variation, including labor rates, materials cost multipliers, and sales tax rates—with differentiation driven by the specified zip code. Each of these parameters are also able to be modified by the user, if appropriate.
The non-annual maintenance cost is used by FEDS to account for costs recurring on a non-annual basis, such as incremental equipment replacements and replacing failed lamps and ballasts. For example, the present value of the non-annual maintenance cost for lighting represents the present value of the total cost (including materials and labor) to replace the burned-out lamps and ballasts of a particular lighting technology over the course of the study period (generally 25 years).
FEDS employs the same standard life-cycle costing methodology and algorithms as the building life-cycle costing computer program developed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology.
The discount rate is the factor used to adjust (discount) future sums of money into the equivalent current year dollar amount. It can also be thought of as the interest rate or hurdle rate (i.e., the rate of return required by a company for it to undertake a project). FEDS uses the real discount rate, which has the effect of inflation removed. FEDS provides the current Federal real discount rate as the default, but the user may enter any discount rate appropriate for their projects. Energy service companies performing shared energy savings contracts typically require real rates of return in the neighborhood of 10 to 20%.
The global cost multiplier is an overall cost multiplier applied to the total project cost (including all materials, labor, taxes, overhead). It can be used to adjust all of the total project costs used in FEDS economic calculations. This could be used for such purposes as to account for special cost-impacting requirements of working at a facility with stringent security requirements or health and safety risks, or to assess the impact of varying costs on project economics.
On the bottom right of some input screens (windows, lighting, heating, cooling, hot water, and motors) is a check box labeled "replacement required". The purpose of this selection is to tell FEDS that this particular building component or technology must be replaced. Whether it has failed (for example, windows are broken, or the furnace has stopped working), or a replacement or upgrade is planned, checking this box will force a replacement to be evaluated and selected when the FEDS optimization analysis is run. If a replacement option is cost effective, FEDS will work as normal; however, if one is not, FEDS will still provide the recommendation even though it may not be otherwise cost effective. FEDS will still report the most cost-effective option and all of the standard details to help users make informed decisions. This option is also known as replace on failure economics.
The lighting use-area fixture density is the inferred fixtures per square foot and is based on typical lumen levels for different use-area types. It represents the average fixtures per square foot over the entire use-area (or building for single use-area buildings). Typically, the user will know the total number of fixtures in a use-area and can enter this and allow the software to calculate the fixtures per square foot.
FEDS project costs are based on industry averages and may not match the exact costs you will be charged. The end-use and technology multipliers are intended to enable the user to adjust for these discrepancies so that the costs used in the FEDS analyses are as close to actual as possible. The recommended approach would be to first enter any known cost data (such as, labor rates, tax rate, discount rate, etc.), and then run FEDS, generate reports, and see what types of projects are coming up. Compare the project costs to actual known costs or bids for similar projects of that type. If any of the technology costs are grossly high or low, adjust them appropriately with a technology multiplier. Rerun FEDS to see if the same technology is being selected, and make sure that the costs more closely represent what the anticipated cost to complete the project. Because of the complex nature of the FEDS cost data, this iterative multiplier approach is the best way for users to modify project costs.
No. At this time FEDS considers only fixture per fixture replacements that provide similar light output. However, the energy impact of correcting an over/under lit condition could be analyzed comparing by two consecutive FEDS baseline runs (by running without optimization).